During the
recent travel from New Delhi to Haridwar in the train, a gentleman from
Bhuvaneshwar, Odisha asked me a question, “ Who suffers? Whatever suffering
happens, it is experienced by whom? Is it our body, our mind, our Atma or by
the divine of which we are part of?”
Such precise
question from a so called semi-literate person was the best trigger for a
beautiful conversation that followed upon. Ultimately the Vedantic take on suffering (Hey Dukkha) and its experience and
the measures or experience of the ‘state of non-suffering’ (Haanopaay) was
discussed. What was impressive was the immense knowledge of such complex
subject by this group of people from rural Odisha.
All these
questions ultimately led to the famous quest we all subject ourselves to:
Who
am I?
In a day to
day life, chat on internet, registration on any website / forum, filing a
complaint in the office, serious debate about religion, international forums
and so on. This question of establishing ones identity comes up. It starts
from name, then surname, religion, caste, geography, state, nation, city,
ethnic group, body type, education, profession so on and on. The list is unending. In the
world of ‘Naam-Roop’ (the world that is seen and experienced) these constant engagements with the ones own identity is a
continuous exercise in today’s world. This exercise of identifying with
something itself gives rise to confusion, creates dilemma and takes the quest
to the further level: Who really am I?
Identifying
with something is a natural human tendency. I think some identities originate
with the ‘sense of ego’. For example, an artiste starts considering himself
larger than life or very special than others. It probably is reflection of his
overgrown ego.
Some
identities originate from the social compulsions/norms. Husband or wife of
somebody obviously expects you to mould you in some social sanctions which
approve you to be right or wrong. As a spouse you have a code of conduct to
abide by. And in identifying with this role, one keeps himself / herself busy.
When the role is demanding and encroaches upon personal wishes / ambitions then
the ‘conflict’ starts. Then one goes into identity crisis. This crisis takes a
toll in the form of end of that role or personal damage to an individual
playing that role.
Religious
identity is something that really keeps big population of the world engaged.
People want to identify with a religion. A group following similar lifestyle.
The interesting fact about this identity is it comes with birth. Very few in
their lifetime, make it a matter of choice. Being born with some religious
identity brings some sense of security / and insecurity to one. And both these
feelings keep seriously engaged to the one who seriously identifies with a
religious identity.
This ‘identity
business’ with something, that our senses experience is a major determining factor
of the worldly affairs. Some identify with something that is beyond senses.
Something that is invisible, intangible still its authority can be experienced.
And we hear terms like ‘one love’, 'peace', 'divine', 'Brahman' etc.
What to
identify with, certainly has to do with ones intellectual, emotional, spiritual
evolution. Some may find it easy to live with a religious identity as it suits
his/her level of evolution. Some like to identify as ‘modern’ as it gives some
sort of mileage / satisfaction to them. Not everybody in the world will
understand or identify with the ‘Brahman’. Some chose identities, some follow
identities they are born with, some don’t care about identities those have
sanction. Some intentionally try to break away from given identities.
Break Away to Pure Consciousness |
In this
world today, there are many identities and multiple sources keep
adding. Also the vast, complex universal phenomenon creates conflict among
identities. Many of my friends say they are not happy with the religion they
are born in. Or with the caste they are born with or the economic situation to
they identify with. I think these are superficial identities and if given
sanction to, they will hardly give the experience of ultimate peace.
Then what identity
will bring that peace?
It’s un-identifying!
Identity is
a ‘conditioning’. And any conditioning brings its weight with it. So it brings
stress or joy. Positive or negative conditioning. Best way to deal with this
stress is to un-identify. Just not molding into something that adds layers of
illusion on the core.
Any dialogue
is a good opportunity to recognize what one identifies oneself with.
Adi
shankaracharya was once traveling in the Dakshin Bharat (South India). He
reached a place Shri Veli. He met a dumb boy there. His name was Hastamalak.
Shri Adi Shankaracharya
asked this boy, ‘O’ boy, who are you? From where are you coming? Where are you
going? Who are your parents? Etc. All those questions which we face often.
Hastamalak
replied,
“I am neither human, God, yaksha, brahmin,
kshatriya,vaisya, sudra, brahmachari, householder, forest-dweller, nor
sannyasi; but I am pure awareness alone. I am the eternal, single,
conscious Self, reflected in various intellects, just as the sun is reflected
on the surface of various sheets of water.”
I think this
is a beautiful identity to live with. Pure awareness.
Or let's say it is a non-identity.
Let’s try to
live with one such. Or without!
Shubham
Bhavatu!
(Image Courtesy: - Eric Pepin, psychedelic adventure)
Yogi Arwind,
ReplyDeleteI am glad we met on the face book, this article is a reflection of my own writing style. I love this article and will post at www.Foundationforpluralism.com and www.Wisdomofreligion.blogspot.com
I am Brhaman in the sense, I am speck of the whole, nothing is different than me and I am not an independent speck. I am interconnected, interdependent and interlocked with other.
This is simply a beautiful artilce, I will read more of your writings.
Thanks
Mike Ghouse
www.Mikeghouse.net